Give a child a robot, he'll play for an hour. Teach him to build, and he'll play forever.
https://mindboards.org:443/
'sub' is an exact synonym of 'void' IIRC. 'sub' is simply an inheritance from NQC, which did not have 'void'.mattallen37 wrote:I think sub is basically identical in function to void, but it is not as efficient, IIRC.
Everyone uses "void", because that's what C/C++ have.m-goldberg wrote:'sub' is an exact synonym of 'void' IIRC. 'sub' is simply an inheritance from NQC, which did not have 'void'.mattallen37 wrote:I think sub is basically identical in function to void, but it is not as efficient, IIRC.
Yes, I meant the file system on the NXT. You can explain it, and I'll see (Because as I said, I don't make a program without it).mattallen37 wrote: Well, then please explain what you mean by "files". do you mean the general concept of files on a computer? If you are referring to the file system on the NXT (reading and writing files with an NXC program), then I don't think you are ready to try to understand how to do it.
We can argue about it all day, but I know John once said:mattallen37 wrote:As far as the whole thing with sub vs. void, I am sure there was SOME reason that void is the better one (not just because of being "standard").
sub exists as backward compatibility with NQC. It's probably defined like this:John Hansen when he was apprenticed to Yoda wrote:Void is emptiness. The alias of void is sub. Nothing more, but the remnants of NQC.
Code: Select all
#define sub voidCode: Select all
typedef void sub