I have a hard time using the search feature in BricxCC. I hit Ctrl+F and the window pops up. I type in what I want to look for, and click OK. Then the window disappears. It would be really nice if a window would stay up with the buttons "Next" and "Previous".
Any thoughts?
wishlist for BricxCC
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
My Githubz of Source Codez, in order of awesomeness:
https://github.com/ArtskydJ/NXC_Source
https://github.com/ArtskydJ/NXC_Tests
My Lego Creations, in no particular order:
LEGO Bop-It - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TsqrBVKbj0
LEGO Safe - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyDRfVquHuY
https://github.com/ArtskydJ/NXC_Source
https://github.com/ArtskydJ/NXC_Tests
My Lego Creations, in no particular order:
LEGO Bop-It - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TsqrBVKbj0
LEGO Safe - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyDRfVquHuY
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
It would be desirable if BCC could also target NxOS (ANSI C compiler), especially also for nxtOSEK.
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
what does the BCC developer team say about a nxtOSEK C-Compiler support?
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
would be nice if one could start the NXT screen automatically by BCC startup and also start polling immediately.
AND to have a shortcut for that (like alt+s or anything)
BTW:
where does the NXTscreen disappear if you click on "minimize"? Maybe an entry in the task bar would be helpful for this thread...
AND to have a shortcut for that (like alt+s or anything)
BTW:
where does the NXTscreen disappear if you click on "minimize"? Maybe an entry in the task bar would be helpful for this thread...
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
and here's another one for the NXT, even if outdated and in vain:
it would be wishful if the i2c send-/receive buffer could be enlarged from currently 14 bytes to faaaaaaar more (e.g., 64, or even 128 or 256).
it would be wishful if the i2c send-/receive buffer could be enlarged from currently 14 bytes to faaaaaaar more (e.g., 64, or even 128 or 256).
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 09:53
- Location: Arizona, USA
- Contact:
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
Don't quote me on it, but I'd think the i2c buffer would be more of a hardware-side limitation than a software-side one?HaWe wrote:and here's another one for the NXT, even if outdated and in vain:
it would be wishful if the i2c send-/receive buffer could be enlarged from currently 14 bytes to faaaaaaar more (e.g., 64, or even 128 or 256).
—Jag
Re: wishlist for BricxCC
no, actually not:
in leJOS it's 32 bytes and Andy Shaw wrote that it was just his voluntary decision to limit it that way.
edit, BTW:
the NXTs don't have i2c hardware for the sensor prts, it's just software-emulated, so-called bit-banging, and that's why its a) so slow and b) why there's just a master mode available (slave bit-banging is a mess as far as I've read, but now don't you quote me on this ).
in leJOS it's 32 bytes and Andy Shaw wrote that it was just his voluntary decision to limit it that way.
edit, BTW:
the NXTs don't have i2c hardware for the sensor prts, it's just software-emulated, so-called bit-banging, and that's why its a) so slow and b) why there's just a master mode available (slave bit-banging is a mess as far as I've read, but now don't you quote me on this ).
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 17 guests